The Systematic Cover Up of Child Abuse

PCFPC.org outlines exactly how our case was handled and what our children reported was happening to them in Riverside, CA.

I was disturbed when looking at California’s human trafficking website, that reports of crimes go to Riverside County Sheriff’s Department. This is the department whose deputies and former Sergeant (allegedly) were abusing children and covered up the crime that our children reported in November of 2015.

You have to wonder how these rings are able to operate for so long, without detection or prosecution of its members. Are they assisted by those who are assigned to protect the public? Corruption exists. It is not an abstract construct or “conspiracy theory”. When laws pass that make it easier for child prostitution to exist on the streets in the Golden state, you have to ask why? What is the aim of our legislators when they pass such bills. Are the consequences considered? Are children just casualties my mere coincidence?

This video may make you wonder “Did California Legalize Child Prostitution?“.

This is also a good read https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WbQSxoBkDuGXvvsiA5FBn4q5LdYVRMiEwxLTnjW0buY/edit?pli=1

 

For more information on our case, you may visit the links associated with RID 1300823 in the main menu.

We must no longer stand for and/or ignore the systematic exploitation of children around the world.

Check out this website if you are interested in details:

MASONIC CHILD ABUSE BY DESIGN

Infiltration

In the website referenced above, it is noted that the many agencies are infiltrated with high ranking members benefiting from child abuse (porn, trafficking, rituals, etc).

I wondered why the reports made to CPS by school staff, therapists, and hospital staff went ignored once contact with the alleged abuser (Bobby David Harris III) was made. All who heard the testimony of our children were initially alarmed, then fell of the earth. The CPS agents representing us from San Bernardino county did not enter a report nor show up in any way shape or form for our children and their reports.

Riverside CPS, who were not assigned to our children sent an agent who had witnessed four hours of interview to testify on the stand. She did not remember what was said. She claimed to have not been paying attention.

I do not think that she was part of the operation in any way. However, for her to make such an outrageous claim, when her only job was to listen and act on their behalf points to some sort of interference.

No report ever made it past the Riverside County Sheriff’s department. And CPS agents remained silent and absent to do their job.

Threats

Our children were told by their father that if they told, he would kill me. This was especially driven into our son when visitation resumed in March of 2016, after nearly four months of no contact with his father.

He became afraid to leave the house and would wet or defecate his clothing. If in public, our son would cling to me, afraid that I would be attacked or killed. I took him to the hospital and he had an X-Ray to see why he could not control his bowel movements before he told me of the threats during supervised visits with his father.

The visits were supervised by the father’s mother, who my son claimed would leave him alone with his father while she and his sister went to the bathroom. That is when his father would make the threats. He said he believed the threats because his father had hurt people before.

He told me that people who participated in the group activities referred to his father as “master”.

I reported these threats to the police, CPS, and to the judge.

I asked for supervised visits and referenced subpoenaed bank statements that showed large (in the 10s of thousands) cash deposits in their father’s bank account. He was granted supervised visits with his mother because he claimed to be “unemployed and broke”. More lies on the pile.

No action was taken. I suppose acknowledging the large cash deposits would come with questions. Who knows?

Drugging

Our children claim to have been regularly given pills or things to drink that made them feel strange. This also made it hard to recall details or made some events they remembered surreal. They both recalled being filmed and claimed that their father kept the videos of them in a safe.

In the site reference above, it claims that children are drugged to confuse their awareness and the validity of their experiences, when/if recounted.

Pedophile Guardians

When children do speak out to people who have no part in the abuse, these people are threatened either by the abusers or their friends in high places. No professional involved would risk their career to accurately account for what they heard our children report.

They remained silent and unprofessional.  Compliant in letting the abusers go free.

Brotherhood Protection

In the web reference, it claims that “It is well documented that even when … abusers are challenged about the alleged abuse they become arrogant …[and]… continue the abuse for many years after. This is due to the fact they know they can continue do what they have always done with impunity as they are fully protected by their ‘Brotherhood’, secret-society ‘friends in high places’.”

I understand intimidation, and protecting one’s family and career from harm by remaining silent. But children will be exploited into perpetuity if no one will speak up.

Rituals

Our children claim to have witnessed many ritualistic behaviors. I’ll leave it there. There is plenty on this elsewhere, and may be a lot to swallow if you are not familiar with ritualistic abuse. I know that took a long while for me to get my head around what they described.

The ‘No Evidence’ Lie

When the police were contacted by the social worker on staff at Kaiser Hospital,  a deputy who our children claim was party to the abuse arrived with a rookie cop. The rookie was put in charge of the investigation until Detective Boyd was assigned.

These handpicked cops ignored the allegations and were biased from the very beginning. Searching their father’s home in two parts, with two weeks in between. In the interim, their father loaded the contents of the un-searched area in to a U Haul truck and hired a professional cleaning company.  Then relied on the fact that “There was No-Evidence”.

This crime was purposely and strategically mishandled from the start. Hard evidence was not found. But our children’s accounts and the response to the abuse, and these outrageous actions by the authorities points to obstruction of justice.

‘Missing’ Files Syndrome

“The Masonic Child Protection Police will conveniently ‘loose’ files of documents and witnesses statements of evidence as well as any film taken of the abuse.”

Besides the fact that our children claimed to have been regularly filmed in sexual and strange situations. None of the video evidence would be found. Even if recovered at the scene, it could have been lost.

Our children’s interview was recorded at the police station in Corona, CA. It was a two hour interview where they said they pointed out where they were touched and described what had happened to them. The DA claimed to have not viewed the tape before not pursuing criminal charges. Where is that tape?

I’ve spoken with family members of a former Sergeant of Riverside County Sheriff’s department. A family friend of their father, and direct supervisor of the deputy the children claimed was involved in the ring. They told me that child pornography was submitted along with his computer to Corona Police. They sat on it for a year and took no action.

His family told me that this is a group of sick men who do sick things and that his group had no boundaries and covered for each other. It was recommended that I take our children and “get out of dodge”.

However, I was confident at that point that our justice system was just that. And that our children would be legally free of the abusers they claimed harmed them.

I was wrong.

Falsified Charges

When Riverside failed to take criminal action on their father, or the men and women they reported filmed and abused them, they also ignored all evidence of trauma from Austin Texas, where the children were being treated.

The judge granted full custody to their father. I was not even allowed to have contact with them. After nearly two years of protecting them and fiercely advocating for justice and their mental health.

When I did not just release my children to the wolves, I was criminalized.  It is not criminal to protect your children from impending and serious danger.

Good Cops Side-tracked

“Decent Non-corrupt Police Child Protection officers can also become involved in the case. As soon as they get suspicious and complain, they are told to shut up and are either removed from the case or they leave the force. The most decent cops become whistle-blowers themselves.”

Whistle-blower Harassment

When I reported the police officers in their involvement in the abuse, and their misconduct in the investigation, I was subject to ongoing and insidious harassment and  surveillance.

I submitted pictures and video reference to the courts of men who followed us home from school, and men who robbed us and tore down our video cameras the day I installed them outside. Their faces were shown. This submission was somehow removed from record, and I could not access my gmail accounts after submitted the video links and images.

Back up everything.

 

Psychiatric Incarcerations for Whistle- blowers

While my ex husband constantly claims I am “crazy”. I have no record or history of mental instability. I have never been treated by a psychiatrist, nor medicated. Although, he has recently. I think the multiple criminal convictions, allegations, and the leaking of the truth about him brought him much mental anxiety.

But they have succeeded in scheduling for my incarceration. Child protection has been misinterpreted as child stealing. This is some circus. But I will not play live threatening games with my children. To do so would indicate mental instability.

 

Pseudo- Incompetence

“The public court enquiry will always ‘find’ Gross incompetence’s and Negligence of the Police and Child Protection Services during their initial and subsequent enquiry’s into the abuse. “

Agencies failed to adequately do their job to represent and protect children at every turn in our case.

“Gross Incompetence and Negligence” is actually “Non-compliance” and “Pseudo-incompetence”.

The ‘loss’ of witnesses statements and crucial documents and film, is in fact the destruction of documents. In our case, no neighbors or those who were named as abusers were questioned.

I spoke to an old friend and neighbor. It was reported to me that other neighbors had seen him loaded video equipment and props in to the U Haul truck. He parked it around the corner for nearly a week. This was not a quick dumping of debris as he and the police report. Even so, debris is not an excuse to perform a partial search and allow the suspect to clean up evidence.

His bank records support what the neighbors report. The U Haul truck was rented for one week.

The Police are never ‘truly’ reprimanded. I received letters after a couple of months from the Riverside County Sheriff’s department stated that my allegations were all unfounded.

The Sergeant mentioned previously, however, did take early retirement.

Where is the accountability?

Whistle-blowers Severely Punished or Killed

Because I would not subject our children to further abuse, I face imprisonment and loss of my basic freedom. I am not a criminal or threat to anyone. I am a mother who has tirelessly advocated for her children over the last two years in this impossible situation.

 

NO Justice – Ever

Instead of justice for telling the truth of their abuse, our children have been victimized further. Their very right to a peaceful and safe environment has been stripped away from them by the courts, for no clear reason.

Evidence of abuse and mishandling of our case is much stronger than “not obeying a court order”. But there is much more to our case than what meets the eye. And I now see that I was in losing battle from the beginning, by entering their courts.

We are now free of the abusers and their acts, but our lives have been drastically changed and endangered in other ways.

Remember – There are NO Isolated cases and There are NO Coincidences!

IN THE NEWS

Recently in the News:

California Cop Arrested for Child Porn Placed on Paid Suspension

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2014/10/17/california-highway-patrol-officer-arrested-on-child-pornography-charges/

School board president arrested for child porn in California

EVIDENCE PRESENTED in brilliant write-up  which explains the detail of six cases that point to this being more than mere separate incidents or isolated events.  Each case is heavily researched with links. It is important to conduct a personal investigation, and not default to take our word for it, or anyone else’s; each must seek their own conclusions.

Recent News in Inland Empire

Child pornography and trafficking occurs all over the world. Rings of men operate together to create and distribute media. The producers and consumers of this content must be caught and exposed. It does happen.

Below are links and articles about groups of men caught in the Inland Empire area.

Don’t dismiss the allegations of victims. Men from all walks of life participate in the exploitation of children.

ICE busts child porn ring

Also arrested in the ring were David Christopher Jelaca, 37, a registered nurse from La Quinta; Alexander Scott Branson, 25, of Upland; Ronald Sousa, 67, of Cathedral City; Bolivar Arnoldo Guillen, 59, of Rancho Cucamonga; Ronald R. Jaenson, 66, of Colton; John Anthony Serrano, 37, of Barstow; and Anthony Starkweather, 20, of Mentone.

 

http://www.dailybulletin.com/general-news/20170403/rancho-cucamonga-man-a-former-temecula-dentist-pleads-guilty-to-possession-of-child-pornography

Rancho Cucamonga man, a former Temecula dentist, pleads guilty to possession of child pornography

Milan Irvin, 34 of Rancho Cucamonga pleaded guilty Monday to one count of possession of child pornography and admitted in a plea agreement that he “downloaded, received, possessed and distributed images and videos of child pornography using the internet,” according to a U.S. Attorney’s Office news release. April 2017

Several Inland Empire men sentenced in federal child porn cases

http://www.sbsun.com/general-news/20161214/several-inland-empire-men-sentenced-in-federal-child-porn-cases

“Child exploitation offenses such as those prosecuted in these cases are a scourge on our community,” said U.S. Attorney Eileen M. Decker. “My office will continue to protect vulnerable child victims of these heinous crimes by seeking lengthy sentences, such as the one imposed this week, for these criminals.”

 

http://riversidecountynewssource.org/2016/05/05/last-of-3-sought-in-palm-desert-child-sex-trafficking-ring-arrested/

News: Alleged Grooming Gang Charged with Multiple Rape, Child Abduction, Trafficking, and Drug Offences

The issue of child pornography and trafficking is often reported, but seldom investigated. Below is a excerpt from the article found on breitbart.com. I’ve reported the specific names of who our children reported filmed and abused them (that I knew), but nothing was done.  Nothing.

Read the article Titled Alleged Grooming Gang Charged with Multiple Rape, Child Abduction, Trafficking, and Drug Offences

“The authorities have been observed as proving reluctant to tackle the problem for fear of being accused of racism, with endemic sexual grooming in Rotherham being effectively covered up until a whistleblower came forward.

This culture of impunity still persists to some extent: in October 2016, one grooming victim told Breitbart London that, when she went to the police, they refused to act. “I’ve gave [the police] about eighty names”, she said. “At first I tried to give the names anonymously but was told that I’d have to give an official statement.”

She eventually did so, but a discovered that the case had been quietly dropped a year later. “None of the men were ever arrested. I don’t think they even knew there was a case.”

The accused in the Huddersfield case, who are presently in court, are predominantly residents of that city, as well as Bradford, Dewsbury, Dudley, Manchester, and Sheffield.”

Police Officers and Sexual Abuse

After reporting the involvement of Riverside County Sheriff Sergeant and his deputies in the abuse allegations made by my children, I saw how secretive police departments were when investigating other officers.

When I went into the Jurupa Valley Station to be interviewed, I was told that I would have no knowledge of what would be done or how the investigation would be handled. In the end, a letter would be sent in the mail stating whether the allegations were founded or not. Either way, none of what they found would be admitted for criminal prosecution.

I wondered what the point of my disclosing abuse to this organization was. Where was the remedy for my children? By reporting these crimes, I opened my immediate family up for harassment and retaliation, but the officers faced nothing but administrative punishment/separation.

Surprise! I received a letter a few months letters stating that all allegations were unfounded. This coincided with reports from mutual friends (Our family had a prior long-standing friendship with the Sergeant’s family), that the Sergeant had taken early retirement.

Retiring, resigning, or being put on administrative leave does not offer a solution to victims who claim they were abused by police officers.  If little or no consequence comes from the reporting of the crime, it is worth the risk for the predator to pursue its victim.

The Riverside Sheriff’s Department is allowed to stay quiet about improprieties to limit liability, allowing officers reported for misconduct to quietly resign, keep their certification and sometimes jump to other jobs. But if the crimes are not addressed, or criminally prosecuted, how will the safety of communities they serve be protected?

In a yearlong investigation of sexual misconduct by U.S. law enforcement, The Associated Press uncovered about 1,000 officers who lost their badges in a six-year period for rape, sodomy and other sexual assault; sex crimes that included possession of child pornography; or sexual misconduct such as propositioning citizens or having consensual but prohibited on-duty intercourse.

This only includes officers whose licenses were revoked, and not all states take that action. In fact, California and New York do not have systems to revoke certifications of officers for misconduct.

In this report, some states did not remove officers for sexual misconduct, even after cases were highlighted in news stories or court records.

“It’s happening probably in every law enforcement agency across the country,” said Chief Bernadette DiPino of the Sarasota Police Department in Florida, who helped study the problem for the International Association of Chiefs of Police. “It’s so under-reported and people are scared that if they call and complain about a police officer, they think every other police officer is going to be then out to get them.”

The AP’s findings, along with other research and interviews with experts, suggest that sexual misconduct is a common type of complaint against law officers. Phil Stinson, a researcher at Bowling Green State University, analyzed news articles between 2005 and 2011 and found 6,724 arrests involving more than 5,500 officers. Sex-related cases were the third-most common, behind violence and profit-motivated crimes. Cato Institute reports released in 2009 and 2010 found sex misconduct the second complaint against officers, behind excessive force.

The day AP announced that nearly 1,000 police officers had lost their badges for sexual assault, Daniel Holtzclaw’s trial for allegedly raping 13 women while on duty began.

After the Associated Press finished the investigation into sex crimes that included possession of child pornography; or sexual misconduct such as propositioning citizens or having consensual but prohibited on-duty intercourse.

The crime I reported, along with the many others, must not be seen as lone instances. These crimes are part of a cultural issue and reflect the health of our society at large. A small percentage of people who are criminally abusive exist, but when they have a badge, they have access to victims with impunity.

Dr. Phil Stinson studies corruption within law enforcement at Bowling Green State University. The former police officer is the head of a study by the Department of Justice called Police Integrity Lost: A Study of Law Enforcement Officers Arrested. “Almost all crime by police officers falls into one or more of these types: alcohol related, drug related, sex related, violence related, or profit motivated.” Dr. Stinson explains that these crimes are hard to track for a variety of reasons. “There’s no official statistics or data any agency keeps [on police crime]. Prior research in this area has been really hampered by various methodological problems; if you survey police officers and police departments there’s a social desirability effect. They’re not going to answer these questions honestly.”

A former Oklahoma City police officer, Daniel Holtzclaw, was sentenced to 263 years in prison January of 2016 after he was convicted of rapes and other offenses that authorities say occurred while he was on duty.

Dr. Stinson’s research shows that the victims of police sexual assault are disproportionately under-aged. He says crimes like these are more common than we think.

He says “When one woman, one girl, or even a boy is believed, and it gets charges brought and it gets in the newspaper—for every one victim that comes forward initially, there’s five more that come forward. That’s what happened with Holtzclaw.”

 When a claim is taken seriously, the cases may never become public; police departments often deal with the issue behind the scenes. “Sometimes [officers are] given the opportunity to resign in lieu of being criminally prosecuted. One of the reasons they have to do that is if they question an officer and they ask him about an incident and they require him to answer the questions, they have to elect that they’re going to use the statements administratively or criminally. Once they’ve decided to use [testimony] for discipline purposes, they can’t use those statements against the officer in court. They have to build their criminal case another way.”

“In some cases instead of charging an officer with a sex crime, they’ll charge him with official misconduct or official oppression or violation of oath. It hides the true nature of the crime, so they might get convicted, but they’re not a registered sex offender.”

Dr. Stinson was a police officer in New Hampshire in the 80’s.  A man was arrested with possession of child pornography. “The sergeant that I worked with at the time spent the next month cataloging and watching every one of the videos. It was clear to me that he had more of an interest than he should have in these cases.”

Dr. Stinson has a theory that policing is “sexual.” “There’s a sexual dynamic to it,” he says. “It’s a twisted power and coercion dynamic, [and it can be] a complete misuse of authority and power.” An officer may encounter sex-related issues throughout their work. “It’s a reoccurring theme. They deal with sex crimes, they’re surrounded by vulnerable people, there are all these different aspects. Power equals sex in many ways. It’s something that is not talked about; there things we don’t discuss in polite company.

Because it has been largely erased from public records, it is challenging to study and to report on this subject matter.

The scars of sexual abuse are not easily erased. But the evidence needed to prosecute the abuse is.

Diana Tourjee notes in her article, “The culture of silence and the imbalance of power are two parts of an institutional system of oppression. Even the researcher confronts obstacles: Studying police corruption has alienated Dr. Stinson from old friends in the force.”.

“I no longer drink with my law enforcement friends in bars,” he says. “People have asked me a lot about that and people have been concerned about it. I don’t get invited to any parties any more. This is not anti-law enforcement. I think of it as pro-law enforcement.”

The references to studies made on sexual abuse and police come from personal experience with reporting sex crimes along with links and references below.

Diana Tourjee’s article for the Broadly. Read it here

Matt Sedensky’s article for the Associated Press. Read it here

Affects of Child Abuse

Physical effects of child abuse

 1. Unexplained burns, cuts, bruises, or welts in the shape of an object
2. Bite marks
3. Anti-social behavior 
4. Problems in school
5. Fear of adults

Emotional effects of child abuse

 1. Apathy
2. Depression
3. Hostility or stress
4. Lack of concentration
5. Eating disorders

Sexual effects of child abuse

 1. Inappropriate interest or knowledge of sexual acts
2. Nightmares and bed wetting
3. Drastic changes in appetite
4. Overcompliance or excessive aggression
5. Fear of a particular person or family member 

Neglect

 1. Unsuitable clothing for weather 
2. Appearance is dirty or unbathed
3. Extreme hunger 
4. Apparent lack of supervision

Long-range effects of child abuse

 Statistics underscore the alarming effects of child abuse over time:
 
  • 36.7% of all women in prison and 14.4% of all men in prison in the United States were abused as children.
  • Children who have been sexually abused are 2.5 times more likely to abuse alcohol and 3.8 times more likely to become addicted to drugs.
  • One third of abused and neglected children will later abuse their own children, continuing the horrible cycle of abuse

How the POLICE investigate child abuse allegations

If concerns about child abuse are reported to the police, they have a duty to investigate. This page tells you more about these investigations and how the decision to prosecute is taken.

Law Enforcement Response to Child Abuse

How the police investigate allegations of child abuse

If someone reports concerns about child abuse to the police, the case will be dealt with by a specialist child abuse investigation team.The team may do one or more of the following things to investigate the allegations:

  • share information with the local authority, schools, and health services to establish what is already known
  • visit and speak to the child, either with or without parental permission
  • visit the home where the child lives or where the offence took place
  • search for and seize evidence of the offence
  • arrange a medical examination of a child (see below)
  • place a child into police protection for up to 72 hours if they believe the child is at risk of immediate significant harm
  • gather statements from potential witnesses (see below).

Medical examinations

The police may want the child who has been abused to be medically examined. The first priority in a medical examination is the safety and welfare of a child.  If a child needs immediate medical treatment, this will always come before any other consideration. Where the child is very young, the parents have to give permission for a medical examination. On rare occasions, a social worker may seek a court order for a medical examination to take place if a parent won’t allow it. If the child is older, the doctor will have to be satisfied that the child is clearly able to give their consent to be medically examined. Police and social workers may attend the medical examination along with the child’s parents and it will be carried out by a specialist pediatrician who will make a record of any injuries and arrange photographs if necessary. If you visit a GP with concerns about child abuse, a further specialist medical examination may need to take place.

Statements

The police may ask anyone who could be a witness to the abuse to provide a statement. This may be written or, particularly with children, by interviewing in a special room with video or DVD recording equipment. When a child is interviewed, a social worker will often be present or may even conduct the interview if they have specialist training. If you are suspected of child abuse, the police must either arrest you or invite you to speak to them at a police station. They must advise you of your legal rights and offer you the opportunity of seeking advice from a solicitor.

Police complaints

If you’re unhappy about the way the police investigate allegations, you may be able to make a complaint.

The decision whether or not to prosecute

Once the police have conducted their investigation and gathered all relevant information, they have to decide if there is enough evidence to consider a prosecution. If there is enough evidence, the police papers are passed to the Child Protective Service (CPS) who make the decision whether a suspect should be charged with an offence or not. CPS may ask the police to make further enquiries or obtain additional evidence. There are guidelines in place which CPS must follow when dealing with a child abuse case. When they make the decision about whether to prosecute someone, specialist prosecutors in CPS must look at all the relevant evidence and decide:

  • if there’s a realistic prospect of conviction, and
  • if a prosecution is in the public interest.

The guidelines say that victims and witnesses should be made aware from the start of the investigation exactly what is expected of them, particularly in terms of going to court and giving evidence, and they should be offered support to help them in this process.  When considering how believable a child or young person is, the police and CPS should focus on the allegation, rather than focusing just on any perceived weaknesses in the victim. In particular, police and prosecutors should avoid making assumptions about victims. A reluctance to cooperate with those in authority, failure to report allegations of abuse swiftly, and providing inconsistent accounts are not uncommon in victims of child sexual abuse, especially during initial interviews’.

The child or young person can be told that other people have made allegations about the suspect. But this should usually only be done after they have given their own account and the details of other allegations shouldn’t be shared.